|
Post by Nathan on Aug 18, 2005 14:12:14 GMT -6
X. When a citizen of Natopia is discovered to be attempting to violate the Royal Code, that citizen will be subject to the punishment outlined in the violated section of the Royal Code. X.2 If no punishment is listed for the violation, citizens will be incarcerated for a period of one year.
i move to debate.
|
|
|
Post by TheRevisionist on Aug 18, 2005 14:16:29 GMT -6
i thinks its fair but...... we have to have real good proof of the crime non of the bullshit that goes on today
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Aug 18, 2005 14:45:16 GMT -6
I'll pretend like he seconded.
Yeah, I guess we do have to have some good proof, maybe survaillence cameras with audio.
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Aug 19, 2005 14:52:40 GMT -6
what if it's somethign extremely small.........they still have to go to jail for a whole year?
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 19, 2005 22:41:39 GMT -6
yes'm. thats the point... to enforce following the rule of law without exceptions. thisll weed out the "oh, if i get caught it'll just be a 50$ fine.. ill do it anyway" people... get em in jail.
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Aug 20, 2005 0:42:37 GMT -6
Duh, our motto is peace through silent oppression. We're oppressing people if they don't follow the law...
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 24, 2005 15:20:01 GMT -6
heeeeey
i move to vote.
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Aug 24, 2005 15:27:19 GMT -6
Second!
yes
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 24, 2005 15:38:21 GMT -6
uh.... i dont really know about this anymore...
yes
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Aug 24, 2005 15:44:51 GMT -6
what if it's one of those "i'm doing it for the GOOD of the people" like stealing bread to feed your famished, dying family... or little 8 yr old joey next door who's parents are both out of work due to the plague or something they have no money so you yank him some milk and eggs. would you..do you..want to put robin hood in jail!??!? i vote no.
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Aug 25, 2005 1:08:37 GMT -6
ugh.. now I have to rethink.
Motion to put this vote on hold (can I do that?)
|
|
|
Post by TheRevisionist on Aug 25, 2005 5:12:29 GMT -6
sherry has a good point, and that just makes me think *brain explodes and joel dies*
|
|
|
Post by Z on Aug 25, 2005 9:35:07 GMT -6
I don’t if Neem can hold votes but I am leaning towards voting no until we put something in there to protect the Robin Hoods, and Jean Valjeans of the world.
Edit: grammer
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 25, 2005 14:45:41 GMT -6
Neem... the power to freeze a vote is absoloute: So voting is frozen until 2am on Saturday (time reckoned from ur motion to freeze) ok, so all u Robin Hood protectors... do u also want to repeal the laws that prevent stealing... or just add "... if its for the good of mankind, go right ahead" to each and every law? Where do u suggest we draw the line here folks? Allow poor people to steal but not the rich? Justice is BLIND!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Aug 25, 2005 14:54:27 GMT -6
Ah, so true.
Man, this sucks. But I like the freezing thing. It makes me feel special.
Well... maybe we should make them go to court and either fine them or put them in jail according to how we see fit.
|
|