|
Post by Nathan on Aug 2, 2005 21:30:25 GMT -6
why do u want loopholes in THIS act?? do u plan on comitting adultery or polygamy?!?!
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 2, 2005 21:32:43 GMT -6
the clause about the "special cases" is loophole-ish
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 3, 2005 19:45:23 GMT -6
i'll let this bill be defeated by a vote, i wont withdraw it.
i motion to vote.
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Aug 3, 2005 19:49:11 GMT -6
second
No
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 3, 2005 19:52:10 GMT -6
Yes
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Aug 3, 2005 20:52:22 GMT -6
NO...you..! you're turning republican nathan!
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 3, 2005 20:54:59 GMT -6
how dare u!!! just because i think that ADULTERY is wrong is no reason to call me such barbaric names
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Aug 3, 2005 21:05:36 GMT -6
HEY hey whoa there. i never said I think adultery is ok. I am simply saying the GOV'T has noo place in dealings like that. what's next? are we going to make an official law outlawing gay marriage ? maybe i shouldn't even mention it or it'll be the next debate.
hey.... if we're outlawing everything we think is morally wrong, (whence came our morals? our religion..?) then let's outlaw every religion we think is wrong! come on let's do it. Let's INFRINGE; I can't wait! oppress oppresss oppress....nazi! j/j but do you get my point yet?
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 3, 2005 21:25:35 GMT -6
what? there will be no religion or gay banning on my watch!! marriage is between TWO people... and that the ONLY definition of marriage this government will enforce.
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Aug 3, 2005 22:58:39 GMT -6
Ay.
This bill fails 1-2-0
Do you want to carry on or can I lock this?
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 3, 2005 23:03:37 GMT -6
lock it.. we can continue iun the pub if we want to.
|
|