|
Post by Nathan on Jul 30, 2005 16:40:31 GMT -6
i move to debate.
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Jul 30, 2005 23:24:58 GMT -6
hahahahahahahaha
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Jul 30, 2005 23:25:23 GMT -6
sorry
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Jul 31, 2005 13:28:38 GMT -6
I second the motion to debate
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Jul 31, 2005 13:36:41 GMT -6
ok... i got this idea from NationStates.net as well. soo... what do we think?
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Aug 1, 2005 12:21:11 GMT -6
no....we don't need so many restrictions. that kind of stuff is more a personal belief
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 1, 2005 21:53:19 GMT -6
lol... i implemented this law in my nationstate... and when it took affect, my "Civil Rights" rating was reduced from Excellent to Average... well, still... i agree with you... but ur the only one who's said anything!!
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Aug 2, 2005 0:25:59 GMT -6
Hmmm... eh... do we need it?
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Aug 2, 2005 7:32:28 GMT -6
I'm sure you had good intentions....but we want our FREEDOM! wahoo! natopia needs to be free!
|
|
|
Post by TheRevisionist on Aug 2, 2005 11:55:20 GMT -6
If people want to hate each other let em hate each other, that is after all what they want...freedom....freedom is what the people want...and i think we should give it to em....even if it is wrong they have to make the decision for themselves...soo i disagree with the act because it limits our freedoms as human beings.
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 2, 2005 17:45:34 GMT -6
We are all obviously of the opinion that drugs are bad (mkay) that is why we are passing the Illegal Substances Act... we beleive doing drugs is wrong... do we also believe that adultery or polygamy is wrong? i believe that that only restriction on marriage is that u can only marry one person... that is what marriage is. but then others say that marriage is only a man and a women.
im only playing devil's adviocate here, because none of you seem to like this because its legislating morals... something the current administration and congress seems to be doing under the grip of the Republicans... but i digress. we've rationalized the drug restriction and alcohol prohibition as it prevents people from harming others... well, adultery may just be being unfaithful to your spouse... but do we consider emotional harm as something we need to legislate against?
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Aug 2, 2005 21:01:50 GMT -6
passing the illegal substance act? since when? i say we change the quorum to 4, that's it if ya'll even vote without me.....
if it hasn't anything to do with you, then don't worry about it! leave them alone! leave everyone alone!
LAISSEZ-FAIRE OUR LIFE! wahoooo
eh i just think this is a really controlling law you're trying to pull here, gov't.
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Aug 2, 2005 21:16:47 GMT -6
so then whats the point of the governemt then?? Peace through silent OPPRESSION!!!!
|
|
|
Post by sherry on Aug 2, 2005 21:29:16 GMT -6
oppression not on your (what are we called again?) nobles! that's for the little people! ain't that what being in power's all about? (JOKING) add me some loopholes before i consent
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Aug 2, 2005 21:29:26 GMT -6
Hahaha, can't argue with that
|
|