|
|
Post by Nathan on Jun 22, 2006 14:54:24 GMT -6
In name only... should we remain known as the Sovereign Natopian Empire.... or go back to the Sovereign Imperial Kingdom of Natopia? I expect beside the name, the only other thing to change would be my title... so also consider how you would like to address me... Emperor or King?  |
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Jun 23, 2006 10:26:32 GMT -6
Actually we've never been the Sovereign Imperal Kingdom of Natopia, I thought it was Sovereign Natopian Kingdom before, but I felt the Imperial name would be more compatible with the original culture of the republic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Jun 23, 2006 13:10:49 GMT -6
trust me:
Supreme Sovereign State of Natopia
Supreme Sovereign Republic of Natopia
Sovereign Imperial Republic of Natopia
Sovereign Imperial Kingdom of Natopia
Sovereign Natopian Empire
|
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Jun 23, 2006 17:10:11 GMT -6
he would know! what's wrong with the current name?
|
|
|
|
Post by Z on Jun 24, 2006 12:13:41 GMT -6
I love the current name!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Jun 25, 2006 10:44:42 GMT -6
Empires are boring crapness crap. Kingdoms are fun. Why not go ask the Gotzborgians? Meh... whatever.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Jun 25, 2006 10:45:02 GMT -6
but don't view that 'whatever' as a concession.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tasneem on Jun 25, 2006 15:19:33 GMT -6
what's with you and your sudden need to call everything crap or other degrading things?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Jun 29, 2006 20:38:31 GMT -6
Crap is fun... as you would have seen on the last "Monday Night Raw." Perhaps I need to express that better: "Kingdoms are more fun than Empires to participate in." Yes, I know it's ESSENCIALLY pointless, but I just... always hated the Empire thing. From a VERY early age I thought the Japanese "Emperor" was tacky. Natopia wasn't asian themed last time I checked... although the weed green would have you think so |
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Jun 30, 2006 0:02:36 GMT -6
Natopia's current political system is looooosely based off the Holy Roman Empire... what with elected emperors and having kingdoms and duchies with considerable power....
and yet its not based on the HRE... because power is consolidated in the emperor.
When i hear "emperor" or "empire" I automaticall think all things Roman.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Jun 30, 2006 14:37:47 GMT -6
Oh... well then that works, but then you would be Caesar (or czar/tsar if you wanted to ) |
|
|
|
Post by FCM on Jun 30, 2006 18:16:36 GMT -6
to be honest for an empire we're kinda small. i mean how many active citizens do we have?
but sayin that im all for keeping things as they are at the moment
|
|
|
|
Post by thegrandczar on Jun 30, 2006 19:49:53 GMT -6
Brian Capelle, Emperors existed in Europe before the Japanese shoguns where EVER called Emperor. And Caesar and Czar are simply better ways to say Emperor.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Jul 1, 2006 12:28:04 GMT -6
Once again, keeping things the way they are are not always the best thing, but at this point it does not matter.
Actually I hate "Czar" and prefer "Tsar" but Caesar is the coolest, and it would be new for micronations, but all of them beat Emperor.
And obviously me talking about Rome makes me know Empires predate Japan.
In fact... the Holy Roman EMpire (Charlemagne) had a King...
|
|
C: 0
