|
|
Post by Nathan on Sept 5, 2006 15:27:35 GMT -6
they are named! usually the names are ugly and technical  |
|
|
|
Post by Z on Sept 5, 2006 17:53:21 GMT -6
But some times they get cool names like Sedna, Psyche, etc...
and no I'm not quallified but my gut tells me that the term 'planet' is in the eye of the beholder. Its not as technical as say defining what an atom or similar is...
|
|
|
|
Post by Nathan on Sept 5, 2006 21:50:49 GMT -6
the astronomers will tell you what to think and you will thank them im actually in an astronomy course now and pluto really has no right being a planet... its all wonky in orbit and its not on the ecliptic... but it will always be a planet in our hearts  |
|
|
|
Post by Z on Sept 6, 2006 10:03:59 GMT -6
My point exactly!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Capelle on Sept 12, 2006 11:59:49 GMT -6
I am the official astronomer of micronationalism and I hereby propose a new classification for Pluto: a poo-poo planet.
|
|
|
|
Post by mz on Dec 10, 2006 19:07:49 GMT -6
gasp.
|
|
C: 0
